Contacting the College of Charleston For Help

<h1>Contacting the College of Charleston For Help</h1><p>Having your school of Charleston paper amended can be both a gift and a revile, contingent upon what you look like at it. You may find that the amendments make your school of Charleston article over and above anyone's expectations, while different understudies will consider the to be as a sign that the school of Charleston was not getting its work done before doling out you the essay.</p><p></p><p>In either case, one thing is without a doubt: you ought to never be hesitant to make some noise when you feel that your expositions are not being paid attention to. At the point when you contact the College of Charleston for help, you are making a major stride in opening the lines of correspondence among you and the school. You are confiding in them with the formation of your school of Charleston paper. You are requesting their recommendation and help with setting up your school of Charleston paper for submission.</p><p></p><p>In this sense, it bodes well that your school will be the person who is at last liable for the school of Charleston article. The College of Charleston will have a great deal to state about what ought to be remembered for your school of Charleston exposition, how the language structure and style of your paper ought to be composed, and how try not to think about the article when your brain strays, among other things.</p><p></p><p>When you contact the College of Charleston for help, they will realize that you need the school of Charleston to utilize the time and exertion that you put into your school of Charleston paper without limit. Much of the time, the College of Charleston might have the option to offer an increasingly viable way to deal with the school of Charleston paper. On the off chance that you need a progressively beneficial exposition, at that point you have to strive to get it right.</p& gt;<p></p><p>When you present your paper, the College of Charleston will likewise get the opportunity to see that your article contains just the data that you have utilized in your paper. The College of Charleston will approach your school of Charleston paper after you submit it, and on the off chance that you give it to them the authorization of the college,they will make it accessible to the school to peruse. The school of Charleston may feel that your exposition has been changed and altered without their insight, and this can bring about a paper that is progressively compelling and persuasive.</p><p></p><p>By giving your article to the school in its last draft, you are building up a second relationship with the school - a relationship that is carefully among you and the school. You can't anticipate that the school should be your ally the entire time, and you ought not expect that the school will consistently be your ally. On the off chanc e that the school or educator demands that you overhaul a specific segment of your article, you ought to consistently be keeping watch for confirmation that your school of Charleston exposition contains the entirety of the data that you have introduced in your essay.</p><p></p><p>At a similar time, the school of Charleston may demand that you return over your school of Charleston paper and right any syntactic or spelling mistakes. You ought to consistently have the graciousness to do this, particularly on the off chance that you notice a blunder that you think could have been gotten. On the off chance that you permit the school of Charleston to alter your school of Charleston article for you, you will be undeniably bound to take care of business the first run through around.</p><p></p><p>Your relationship with the school of Charleston ought to never prevent you from talking about your interests with the school, and it ought to never pe rmit you to feel that your sentiment is unimportant. The College of Charleston is in the matter of helping understudies get ready for their school of Charleston papers, and you are a piece of the college. This implies your sentiment on this issue matters.</p>

Use Funny Argumentative Essay Topics

<h1>Use Funny Argumentative Essay Topics</h1><p>Humorous and pugnacious paper points can assist understudies with prevailing throughout everyday life. Composing an article can be an overwhelming undertaking for some understudies, however this doesn't mean they can't be effective. It just implies that understudies need to have the privilege tools.</p><p></p><p>Using entertaining contentious article points will guarantee that your understudy's exposition is increasingly effective. This is on the grounds that understudies will have the option to manage the worries of school and school by getting a type of discharge. The unwinding that originates from composing an article implies your understudy will be able to traverse the exposition simpler and faster.</p><p></p><p>The best thing about amusing pugnacious paper subjects is that they are composed by individuals who have likewise experienced a similar procedure. In this man ner, when you read an article by one of these individuals, you can see their style. Your understudy will know promptly what the person in question ought to improve. Along these lines, you will have the option to amplify your understudy's achievement in the essay.</p><p></p><p>When you compose a paper, you are permitting yourself to flop so as to figure out how to improve as an individual at school. As it were, your understudy is compelled to consider disappointment and its impact on the school. In this manner, the individual in question will be compelled to consider how they can deal with disappointment and succeed. Without disappointment in their lives, understudies will experience difficulty acclimating to the worries of school and college.</p><p></p><p>If you need to utilize amusing pugnacious exposition subjects, you should discover genuine instances of them on the web. They are not hard to track down in light of the fact that ther e are a lot of understudies and instructors who compose fascinating and engaging expositions about them. Moreover, you can likewise search for comical political contentions online that are composed by understudies that were in political campaigns.</p><p></p><p>The utilization of amusing pugnacious article subjects doesn't need to be utilized constantly. You can just embed them into your exposition when you feel they will make your understudy's article all the more fascinating. More often than not, the utilization of clever contentious exposition subjects is utilized as a component of a progression of papers that has been composed before.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, on the off chance that you have just composed a decent arrangement of papers, you may think that its supportive to include a few them utilizing interesting points in them. This is on the grounds that it permits your understudy to examine the focuses made by the exposition and af terward revise them with a couple of changes. The progressions will make the exposition all the more intriguing and it will enable your understudy to all the more likely comprehend the whole subject. In this way, when the person completes the entire arrangement, they will be increasingly arranged to handle the following task with confidence.</p><p></p><p>Once you figure out how to utilize amusing factious exposition points, you will see that your understudy is loose, cheerful, and certain. This is on the grounds that they have figured out how to deal with disappointment. Accordingly, it is anything but difficult to perceive any reason why they can prevail in life.</p>

Various Motives for Corporate Takeovers - Free Essay Example

Mergers and Acquisitions (MA) occur when two or more organisations join together all or part of their operations (Coyle, 2000). Strictly defined, a corporate takeover refers to one business acquiring another by taking ownership of a controlling stake of another business, or taking over a business operation and its assets (Coyle, 2000). Corporate takeovers have been occurring for many decades, and have historically occurred on a cyclical basis, increasing and decreasing in volume in what has been termed merger waves since the late 1800s (Sudarsanam, 2010). There can be a number of distinct motives for corporate MA and this short essay will discuss a number of these, drawing on theoretical and financial theory as well as empirical evidence to explain their rationale. The first group of motives to be discussed are those that relate and can be explained by the classical approach to financial theory (Icke, 2014). These motives assume that firms do not make mistakes and acquire other companies as they believe that doing so will result in increased profitability (Baker Nofsinger, 2010) as they allow for the achievement of enhanced economies of scale or scope (Lipcynski et al., 2009). This theoretical perspective can be used to explain a number of motives. First, corporate takeovers can be used as a route to achieving geographic expansion. By acquiring another company in a different country or with more geographically-diverse operations, an acquiring company can expand its markets and thus expand its sales opportunities. The larger bus iness post-acquisition can then, if implemented efficiently, benefit from economies of scale associated with reducing unit input costs, ultimately increasing profitability. A second reason for completing a takeover could be to increase market share within a market a firm is already operating in. This can result in increased profits through again allowing for increased economies of scale through decreasing unit costs and can also increase profitability by reducing the number of competitors in a market. Thirdly, acquiring businesses at different stages in the supply chain, known as vertical integration (Icke, 2014), can allow for enhanced profitability as it can facilitate enhanced value in the supply chain and the potential to exercise control and scale benefits over inputs to production and the overall cost of output. Other motives for corporate takeovers can be categorised as being more consistent with the behavioural school of thought. This considers that MA is driven by factors other than for pure profit maximization (Icke, 2014; Martynova and Renneboog, 2008). There a number of reasons why MA may take place where the opportunity to benefit from scale economies is not the key driver. First, a company may engage in an acquisition in a bid to increase their size to prevent bids from other companies. This is consistent with the concept of eat or be eaten (Gorton et al., 2005) which hypothesizes that during waves of MA activity, firms feel vulnerable to takeover bids and as such feel compelled to engage in their own MA activity in order to increase their size and minimize interest from potential bids. A second motive for MA that relates more to the behavioural school (but does possess some economic basis) is the opportunistic MA activity associated with management taking advantage of a relative increase in the value of its stock to acquire a target in an equity-funded acquisition. In this case, it is the perceived opportunity to buy another company cheaply that drives the acquisition, rather than the profit motive if all other variables are held equal. What empirical evidence do we have in regard to value creation following a takeover for: the bidder firms shareholders the acquired firms shareholders Mergers and Acquisitions (MA) occur when two or more organisations join together all or part of their operations (Coyle, 2000). A number of empirical studies have been performed in order to ascertain the extent of value creation following a takeover for both the bidder firm and the acquired firm. Shareholders of the acquired firm have consistently experienced positive value impacts (Icke, 2012; Martynova and Renneboog, 2008) following completion of a takeover, while evidence of value creation following a takeover for the acquirer has been inconsistent and is broadly considered to be inconclusive (Angwin, 2007). This essay will discuss the empirical evidence of the value impact following corporate takeovers for both parties, looking at a broad range of evidence spanning the time following announcement to the fiscal years following completion of a takeover. The essay will briefly discuss the limitations of the evidence based on the highly differentiated nature of the MA landscape and the presence of significant independent variables. It will then evaluate the results before arguing that for the bidder firms shareholders evidence of value creation is broadly inconclusive and that it appears that any value creation that is witnessed differs depending on the type and motives for the acquisition, as well as when it is taking place. It will argue that, as is consistent with the majority of empirical studies, value creation for the acquired companys shareholders is positive (Martynova and Renneboog, 2008). The value creation experienced by shareholders in the bidder firm following a takeover can be considered both post announcement and in the years following completion and integration of the businesses. Value impacts at announcement are most profound in the impact of share price fluctuations while performance-based metrics, such as profitability, can be used to assess value impacts following takeover (Icke, 2012). First looking at the empirical evidence that su pports positive value creation for the acquiring shareholders it is clear that there are a number of studies that demonstrate the positive value creating effects of a cross-section of transaction types. Looking at the US and Europe, Martynova and Renneboog (2008) measure the value impacts following a takeover by studying a century of historical MA transactions. The evidence indicates that in the case of European cross-border transactions, value is created in terms of post-acquisition performance. Looking at developing countries, Kumar (2009) finds that in the case of developing economies, acquirer shareholders tend to experience better returns in both the short and long term following an acquisition than in developed economies. Gugler et al (2003), look specifically at the impact on sales and profitability of a takeover and find that acquisitions have a statistically significant impact on profit of the acquiring company. Chari et al. (2010) look at cross-border transactions and prov ides evidence that the acquirers will experience improved post-merger performance, but that this is dependent on having intangible asset advantages that can be exploited abroad. Villalonga (2004) studied diversification takeovers in a study that reviewed the share price performance of diversified conglomerates versus non-diversified trading peers in the years following the transaction. The evidence reveals that diversified firms actually trade at a large and significant premium to their peers, thus suggesting that this type of acquisition can drive long term value gain for shareholders in the post-acquisition entity. Draper and Paudyal (2006) studied the value creating impacts of private versus public takeovers and found that value creation for the acquiring company when the target is private is broadly positive. An empirical study by Icke (2014) looks at European and US MA transactions by motive for takeover and finds that, in terms of announcement effects on share price, transacti ons driven by an increase in market share, research development synergies and vertical transactions are rewarding for the acquiring company. In terms of longer term gains, Icke (2014) shows that transactions driven by increase in market share, geographic expansion, vertical integration and diversification all have a positive effect. In contrast, there is a wide body of empirical research which contrasts with the findings of the above studies and covers a range of different MA situations where value is in fact destroyed for the acquiring company shareholder both in terms of share price at announcement and in terms of post-integration performance. In a study that considers a broad range of takeover motivations, Walker (2000) finds that acquiring companies experience overall negative value impacts and those anomalies in which acquirers actually gain in the longer term are so infrequent they are considered to be statistically insignificant. When Martynova and Renneboog (2008) study US transactions aimed at achieving diversification the evidence indicates that post-acquisition value is destroyed for acquiring shareholders following a transaction and that wealth effects at announcement for acquirers are inconclusive. In a 2005 study, Powell and Stark (2005) find that post-acquisition performance in terms of sales impact, is actually positive for the acquirer, however, when this is controlled for extra working capital, the effect is inconclusive and likely a net negative result. Looking at vertical integration takeovers, both Kedia et al (2011) and Walker (2000) find that in the case of US transactions, takeovers result in value destruction for acquiring company shareholders. Icke (2014) also found that RD driven takeovers have a negative effect. The empirical evidence in relation to target firms shareholder value creation is significantly more conclusive across the spectrum of types of MA. Empirical studies, which tend to focus on value creation for the owner s of target companies primarily looks at shareholder value at announcement (Icke, 2014) in the form of share price rises and the premiums acquirers pay. Martynova and Renneboog (2008) find that targets gain value from announcement of a takeover and furthermore find that this gain is consistent across merger cycles, regardless of whether the takeover occurs during the peak or the low of the merger waves witnessed throughout the past century (Martynova and Renneboog 2008). Their study into US takeovers demonstrates that the value creation is significant in size, often reaching double digit growth on the value prior to announcement. In a study of hostile versus friendly takeovers, Shwert (1996) found that target shareholders experience significant gains from a takeover that has come about as a result of a tender process, rather than a hostile a single party bidding round, although found broadly positive results across both types for target shareholders. Likewise, studying the method of payment and the impact on value creation for target shareholders, Goergen and Renneboog (2004) found that all-cash offers trigger ARs of almost 10 percent upon announcement whereas all-equity bids or offers combining cash, equity and loan notes only generated a return of 6 percent but still resulted in positive value creation for the target company. Empirical studies have also been conducted on transaction data based around the concept of merger waves. That is to look at transactions not as isolated occurrences but as events that have taken place within one of the six identified waves of MA activity since the late 1800s (Sudarsanam, 2010). By looking at takeovers from the perspective of when they occurred, it is possible to identify more consistent patterns in value creation and to derive theories of attribution for these gains. Icke (2014) reviews a number of studies and finds that value creation for shareholders in both the target and the acquiring company varies depending on the wave in which it occurs when other variables are considered to be constant. Icke (2014) shows that the third wave generated largely positive returns for parties engaged in takeovers, while the fourth was broadly negative and the value impacts were indistinguishable during the fifth. This evidence of environment-sensitivity adds further complexity to the evidence surrounding value creation in takeovers. Overall there is a wealth of empirical evidence available into the value impacts of corporate takeovers, however, the evidence is broadly inconclusive in determining the value creating opportunities for acquirers while it is broadly conclusive that target company shareholders will gain (Martynova and Renneboog 2008). The inconclusive nature is caused by methodological inconsistencies as a result of mixed methods, the difficulty capturing operational change, the different time periods and sample size distortions (Icke, 2014) as well as the vastly differentiated base of empirical evidence that exists, as discussed in this essay. As Icke (2014) states, the value effects of takeovers are, ultimately, non-conclusive. However, based on the empirical evidence discussed in this essay and drawing on Wang and Moini (2012), the general conclusion can be seen to be that in short-term event studies (addressing the impacts post-announcement) acquirers will either experience some normal returns or significant losses, while the target firms have shown to consistently experience positive value creation in the same timeframe. Post-acquisition performance is extremely difficult to measure and the evidence has been mixed. Furthermore, as Angwin (2007) argues, strategic motivations are essential for understanding post-takeover performance and for measuring the isolated effects of the takeover. In conclusion, there exists a number of studies and a diverse body of empirical evidence into the value creating effects of takeovers for both target and acquirer shareholders. For t arget shareholders, studies focus on the announcement effects and are broadly positive, while for acquirer shareholders, studies look at both announcement and post transaction performance and show a broadly negative value impact with some evidence of positive value creation in certain types of MA scenario and during certain periods (waves) in history. Bibliography Angwin, D (2007). Motive Archetypes in Mergers and Acquisitions (MA): The implications of a Configurational Approach to Performance. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions. 6. pp77-105. Baker, KH and Nofsinger, JR. (2010). Behavioral Finance: Investors Corporations and Markets. Hoboken, Nj:John Wiley Sons Inc. Chari, A., Ouimet, P.P. and Tesar L.L.. (2010). The value of control in emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies. 23(4). pp1741-1770. Coyle, B (2000). Mergers and Acquisitions. Kent: Global Professional Publishing. Draper P. and Paudyal K. (2006). Acquisitions: Private versus Public. European Financial Management. 12(1). pp57-80. Goergen, M and Renneboog, L (2004). Shareholder Wealth Effects of European Domestic and CrossBorder Takeover Bids. European Financial Management. 10(1). pp9-45. Gugler, K., D.C. Mueller, B.B. Yurtoglu and Ch. Zulehner (2003). The Effect of Mergers: An International Comparison. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 21(5). pp625-653. Icke, D (2014). AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF VALUE CREATION THROUGH MERGERS ACQUISITIONS A STRATEGIC FOCUS. Aarhus University, Business Social Sciences [online]. Available at: https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/68137404/Final_Thesis_31.12.2013_Daniel_Michael_Icke.pdf Kedia, S., Ravid, S.A., Pons, V. (2011).When Do Vertical Mergers Create Value?. Financial Management. 40(4). 845-877. Kumar, N. 2009. How emerging giants are rewriting the rules of MA. Harvard Business Review. 87(5). pp115-121. Lipczynski, J., Wilson, O.S. and Goddard, J. (2009). Industrial Organization: Competition, Strategy, Policy. Third edition. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited. Martynova, M and Renneboog, L (2008). A Century of Corporate Takeovers: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Stand?. Journal of Banking Finance. 32(10). pp2148- 2177. Powell, RG. and Stark, AW. (2005). Does operating performance increase post-takeover for UK takeovers? A comparison of performance measures and benchmarks. Journal of Corporate Finance. 11(1-2), pp293-317. Schwert G.W. (1996). Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics. 41(2). pp153-192. Sudarsanam, S (2010). Creating Value from Mergers and Acquisitions The Challenges. Essex, England: Pearson Hall. Villalonga, B.N. (2004). Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series. The Journal of Finance. 59(2). pp 479-506. Wang,D. and Moini, H. (2012). Performance Assessment of Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from Denmark. [online]. Available at: https://www.g-casa.com/conferences/berlin/papers/Wang.pdf Walker, MM (2000). Corporate Takeovers, Strategic Objects, and Acquiring-Firm Shareholder Wealth. Financial Management. 29(200). pp55-66.

Writing Center Review - What a Harvard Writing Center Application Can Do For You

<h1>Writing Center Review - What a Harvard Writing Center Application Can Do For You</h1><p>When I was in secondary school, I needed to compose an investigative paper on a proposition for my English class. It expected me to utilize exposition altering programming to trim and alter the article. Since I had just been presented to the ideas of how article altering programming functions and what it does during my school days, I knew the nuts and bolts about how to utilize the program and what to do over the span of the assignment.</p><p></p><p>The first thing that I did before starting the exposition was to get to know the program. The most significant highlights that I needed to check were the manner by which quick the article manager works, what number of words it can alter on the double, and how it handles sentence structure. The latter isn't as imperative to me yet is as yet significant for an understudy as altering is required.</p>< p></p><p>I found that the application had a couple of quick and easy to use working rates. I found that it filled in as quick as I could press the key blend or mouse button while exploring the PC. The program was likewise incredibly helpful to use since the console alternate ways were completely marked so I could undoubtedly utilize them.</p><p></p><p>The manager permitted me to alter my systematic exposition without a lot of pressure. The editorial manager permitted me to embed content boxes in my article, expel content boxes, and move words around. In the wake of doing these things, I just completed the creative cycle by sparing the paper in the right arrangement and submitting it to the school. Obviously, altering is all simply the first step.</p><p></p><p>During the course of the task, the composing place permitted me to carry notes to my teacher. I did this with the goal that I could address my paper and have my sli p-ups rectified. I likewise exploited the programmed revision highlight in the program to ensure that my exposition would be mistake free.</p><p></p><p>After completing the first examination of my paper, I returned over the article and began rectifying the blunders I had recently made. The programmed revision include worked incredible and permitted me to have the option to catch and fix mistakes. As an additional advantage, the programmed adjustment include was a piece of the scholastic composing community that empowered me to get the entirety of my composed assignments and class assignments in my email account so I could get to them as I required them.</p><p></p><p>The entire experience was a breeze and the editorial manager gave me numerous advantages. I never experienced disappointment with the Harvard composing center.</p><p></p><p>My composing experience improved as I kept on utilizing the product. I had on e grumbling with the program however it was not identified with its quality yet progressively identified with its simplicity of use.</p>